The New
Art of Grassroots Campaigning
In
the United States, the first use of the phrase "grassroots and boots"
is thought to have been created by Senator Albert Jeremiah Beveridge of
Indiana, who declared of the Progressive Party in 1912 that: "This party
[the Progressive Party] has come from the grass roots. It has grown from the
soil of people's hard necessities” (http://www.websters-online-dictionary.org/definitions/Grassroots).
In an article for
online readers, Ruth McCambridge (2012) wrote:
So...I can claim editorial
prerogative to declare a word-of-the-day or even of the century for this sector
it is grassroots. The meaning of the
term should be sacred to nonprofits and we should be crystal-clear about what
it means. Grassroots groups are organizations that do not just reflect the
voices of those people most affected by the issue being addressed but are
responsive to and largely led by these constituencies.
In the United States, candidates running for office use several
combinations of grassroots campaigning to reach constituents. Some include door to door solicitation, town
hall meetings and mailings. Have you ever opened your mailbox and found it
stuffed with flyers, post cards and generated letters from prospective local,
state, or national officials running for office? Have you ever noticed a candidate’s door
hanger at your front door and wondered when did that get there? So, now you have a handful of flyers and a
door hanger to dispose of. The next stop
is the trash can, what a waste. However
I conclude that it would be simpler to not have to deal with all the ads, and
be able to just read it then delete it. Hopefully
the information presented in this blog will help you come to the same conclusion.
In the 2008 U.S. presidential election, the Obama campaign
created a Social Network Site (SNS), my.barackobama.com, to successfully
recruit thousands of campaign volunteers from across the country, and to sign
them up for door-knocking and precinct-walking (Dickinson, 2008). President Obama’s campaign proved that this
new grassroots movement can lead to significant voter registration for a
political party. This style of campaigning provides evidence that SNS can be
used in conjunction with traditional grassroots campaigning to become a very
effective tool for reaching constituents.
Traditional
media during campaigns such as posters, television advertising, press conferences
and journalistic interviews continue to be important political functions. Campaign television ads still remain a
cornerstone for politicians. However, in
a website article for the Local Victory called, “Using Social Media
in Your Campaign” Joe Garecht (2010) stated that:
Political
consultants and candidates touted the promise of the Internet and e-mail in
changing the face of campaigns. As with most innovations, proponents of
web-based campaigning oversold the medium, suggesting that within a year or
two, campaigns would raise most of their money and spend much of their time
exclusively online.
A new study indicates that social media is one of the
best ways to get into office. According
to the study released by SocialVibe (2011), a digital advertising company,
“social media creativity helps candidates stand out amidst the noise of
campaign season.” The results of this
study also found that “engagement advertising” through social media yields increased
financial return in political campaigns.
The main component for this very rapid growth is the “sharing” effect of
digital content. Sharing through Twitter
can be done by simply re-tweeting the tweet.
Information obtained by email, blogs, Facebook and YouTube can be
forwarded or shared as well. This
process is faster, and less labor intensive than door to door campaigning, and
also more cost effective than flyers, postcards, and door hangers.
A study conducted
by Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (2010), reported that 97% of
those polled used Facebook during the election. In addition, the report showed
that a particular age group used social media to discuss the election, share
content and take polls. The study also suggested that the 18-24 year old age
group "receive most of their political information online and rarely read
a printed newspaper or listened to radio for information." Furthermore, in response to an article
in Policy & Internet (2012); “The Case Against Mass Emails,” David Karpf
(2012) tests those claims, relying on a combination of personal observation
within the advocacy community and on a new quantitative dataset of advocacy
group email activity to articulate three points. His first point is that emails
are functionally equivalent to the photocopied, faxed petitions and postcards
of ‘offline’ activism and represent a difference-of-degree rather than a difference-in-kind. Secondly, such low-quality, high-volume
actions are a single tactic in the strategic repertoire of advocacy groups,
providing a reduced cause for concern about their limited effect in isolation.
Finally, the empirical reality of email activation practices has little in
common with the dire predictions offered by common critiques.
Look
at it like this, in the 2008 Presidential election, then-Senator Obama and his
campaign staff initiated a strong use of social media. Doris Graber‘s book Mass Media and American Politics obtained and supplied
statistics about President Obama‘s use of social media in the 2008 campaign,
and the clearly visible discrepancies between Obama‘s use of social media and
the social media use of his opponent, John McCain. Statistics like Obama having
2 million Facebook friends while McCain only had 600,000 proved that Obama used
social media much more than McCain in the 2008 election (Graber 2010). Facebook groups like “One Million Strong for
Barack,” and “Students for Barack Obama” underlined user generated support for
Obama during his 2008 campaign.
With
this information it seems hard not to conclude that SNS played an influential
part in the 2008 and 2012 Presidential elections, and has set the standard for
future elections. Will SNS eliminate
television ads, journalistic interviews, and debates? Probably not; in fact it should be used in
conjunction with these grassroots styles of campaigning. What this style of grassroots campaigning
using SNS can do is, cut down on some of the mailings, flyers, and door-hangers
constituents receive, and throw away.
Campaign funds can be generated and information can be transferred
faster. Social Network Sites allow
constituents to simply read it then delete it.
Reference Page
Aregbe‘s, Farouk. Facebook group. One Million Strong for
Barack. Retrieved June 10, 2012.
http:/www.facebook.com/group.php
Garecht, Joe. (2010) Local Victory. Using Social Media In Your Campaign, Retrieved June 10, 2013.
http://www.localvictory.com/communications/political-social-media
Graber, Doris. (2010). Mass Media and American Politics
Karpf, David. (2010). Policy &
Internet, Vol. 2, No. 4, 7-41
Negroponte N. 1995. Being Digital. New York: Knopf
President‘s
Obama‘s Facebook fan page. Retrieved
June 10, 2012.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/barackobama
Social Network Sites and Politics.
(2012, March) Pew
Research Center. Retrieved June 10,
2013.
http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/internet/research-internet-effects- politics-key-studies