Sunday, June 16, 2013

Social Media In Politics



Social Media in Politics
To many social media is just but another form of communication channel for the society to use.  However, a closer review of the uses that the social media has been put to, in the recent past, reveals that there is more to it than just being another form of communication and interaction for the public. Basically, the rise of the social media has had far reaching implications not only on the way the society communicates and interacts, but also on the way the local authorities have been and continues to interact with its stakeholders. The rise of the social media has ideally transformed the way in which the society works, socializes and communicates. Such effects of the social media have infiltrated in many of the state’s functions. In the recent past, the social media’s role in the local governments’ policies, procedures and elections has increased (Dadashzadeh 2010). Research reveals that scholars are in agreement with the social media’s impacts and implications on such states’ functions. However, the level of such impacts and implications on such functions remains the subject of debate, to many scholars. Therefore, this paper sought to review the effect of the rise of the social media on the local governments’ policies, procedures and elections in the modern society.
            The social media is defined as the use of electronic tools and platforms to publish, converse and share information. The social media usage has emerged as a compliment to the existing two-way electronic communication technique, which include emails and websites. In the recent past, the social media technology has emerged as a popular, rapidly growing and constantly evolving means of communication (Downey 2012). The technology has positioned itself as an increasingly important means of communication, not only for the public, but also for the authorities as means through which its staff communicates with each other, as well as engages the community. The readership and viewership of the traditional media such as print media, radio and television are slowly declining amongst the different demographic groups, specifically among the young people. On the other hand, social media usage is increasing rapidly, making it the most efficient way of engaging a wider public. Social media is an open channel of communication, meaning a wide variety of individuals can view, comment on, or share materials. The platform is designed to be shareable, meaning there are very little barriers for people to share back and forth on opinions with as potentially wide audience.
The rise of the social media in the modern world has transformed both local and international policy development context. Considering that policymaking is a political process that is affected by various social and economic factors, the social media is continuously shaping the social context through which the policies are being developed. In the past, the citizens would gain information on various policies and how they affected them, and the government would have difficulties, besides it was costly for the government to gain feedback on their various programs and policies. The social media, however, has eased this difficulty, increasing the interaction not only between the policy makers and the citizens, but also between the citizens themselves, a dimension that was not there in the traditional communication channels..
Social media usage by the public has enhanced transparency in policy development. The public is constantly using social media to push for transparency in both local and international policy formation processes. The social media provides a public interaction platform for the public to lobby for more transparency from their local governments in the way of developing policies that affect them. With the explosion of the social media technologies, the issues with privacy in governance are slowly becoming a thing of the past. With increased access to governance information, the enhanced communication and information circulation, the public can now share information concerning governance policies. The rise of social media has provided the community with an opportunity to engage and participate actively in discussions that are of national importance, interest and that are of concern to them at and increased extend and promptly than before.
            In addition, social media usage has gone beyond transparency demands in the public policy development processes into demands for increased citizen engagement in policy development. As result of the social media, government agencies have created active citizen participation in their policy development processes. Therefore, the social media’s promotion of public engagement has resulted better decision being taken regarding policy formation through better capturing of the public knowledge and opinion on the policies. The public engagement has not only enhanced the publics’ understanding of the policies, but also has increased the public support through legitimizing the solutions. Therefore, by enhancing transparency and public participation in the policy development process, the social media usage by the public is promoting accountability, which is one of the key elements of good governance.
            As a response to the increased public pressure from the usage of the social media, to push for increased participation and more transparency in the development of the policies that affect them, governments across the world are increasingly incorporating social media platforms in their day-to-day governance operations. The increasing social media integration in governance and community affairs has been a significant change agent in shaping the future democratic models. Social media usage has the potential of dramatically altering how the local government and the public interact, formulate solutions, and deliver services. Besides, the social media has offered opportunities to rethink the traditional boundaries that existed between individuals, the public, communities and the existing levels of governance. Social media has facilitated local reporting, whereby the public gets to highlight the problematic areas in their region, neighborhood, community or county. Social media has facilitated a platform in which such local reporting is used to inform the like-minded people or bring to the attention of the local authorities, enhancing speedy policy formation that is localized.
            In the recent past, the world has witnessed the rise in the use of the social media in political communication. It is evident from political dynamics around the world that Internet social media has profoundly transformed the way the politician engages with the electorate. Research has revealed that the social activists, non-governmental organizations, political campaigners, governments and the business communities are increasingly making the social media’s connective power to as a tool to mobilize support, disseminate information, produce knowledge, and deliver services and to engage with the stakeholders. There have been numerous incidences where the social media has been used as a tool in fostering the public’s support in fighting corrupt leadership. Perhaps one of the most recent applications of the social media was in North Africa, where the public through the use of the social media to mobilize public support to fight repressive regimes.  
            The social media is therefore known to draw in many people quickly through the network effect. Research has proved that the network properties of the social media can be a very powerful tool in mobilizing political support. Today, there are many politicians that are embracing social media in their political campaigns. Considering that most users of the social media, and preferably the Internet, are the youths, who forms the majority of the voting population, election candidate have realized this trend. Therefore, having discovered the effect of the social media on the election outcomes, politicians are increasingly using the social media to reach out to this section of the voters. In the United States, the biggest percentages of social medial sites are the young people aged between 18-30 years. It is also revealed that this section of the young people constitutes the biggest percentage of the American population. In the 2012 elections, the candidates, armed with such facts about the American society, adopted a campaign strategy that utilized the social media intensively. For instance, according to Twitter, more than 500,000 tweets were posted during the four presidential debates for the presidents and the vice presidents. Therefore, the role of the social media in elections is undeniably real and continues to grow each day. Therefore, the role of the social media in the American elections of 2012 was to facilitate the politicians to reach out to the American young voters.     
            Perhaps the most lasting impact of the social media in the American election is that, the social media platform has facilitated a 24-hour candidate scrutiny. With the social media use in elections, the public is able to put the politicians under a 24-hour spotlight, where the electorate is able to evaluate the policies, character, and all other relevant aspect there is to know about a candidate. Therefore, with the social media in place, there is no such thing as private comment or trail by the candidates.
            There is the shifting attention away from the media networks to the social networks. It has been revealed that today, majority of the American electorate obtains their election information from social media networks other than the traditional media networks such as newspapers. As much as the influence of the traditional media networks is still strong, the affect that social media use has on the undecided voters is significant, given that it allows for every individual to voice their opinion.

References
Bryer, T. A. (2013). Designing Social Media Strategies for Effective Citizen Engagement: A Case Example and Model. National Civic Review Vol. 102 Issue 1 , p43-50.
Dadashzadeh, M. (2010). Social Media In Government: From Government To eGovernance. Journal of Business & Economics Research Vol. 8 Issue 11 , p81-86.
Downey, E. &. (2012). Public service, governance and Web 2.0 technologies: Future trends in social media. Hershey, PA:: Information Science Reference.

2 comments:

  1. Response to Social Media In Politics
    With the increase of social media sites, and citizens using social media it is no surprise that candidates for political offices turn to social media to grasp the attention, approval and votes of social media users. Social media can portray a positive light on candidates one may not have known about without the use and information from a social media site. Social media opens the doors for political topics and agendas being discussed to potential voters. However, social media can also open the door for rumors and mis-factual information being released to the public.
    Rumors have constantly been spread over the use of social media sites. Most consist of rumors of famous celebrities dying, but others can be very damaging to careers. A celebrity could easily say they in fact did not die and are still alive. Rumors that damage a person’s creditability, especially a politician can be very hard to recover from. In some cases, it takes a press release to clarify the issue and rumor that was created.
    On July 2, 2013, The Liberty Paper posted an article about President Barrack Obama and his speech to collegian interns in Washington D.C. about Independence Day (Obama to College 2013). The article states that President Obama gave a speech that made interns uneasy. When asked if he thought Americans should celebrate the birth of the United States, he replied, “I believe we should celebrate where we are going. Celebrate moving forward, not where we have been.” This article was shared over 10,000 times on Facebook alone. In reality, this article was listed as a political satire, but in the end Americans were furious when they read it and shared it to others because of the disbelief they faced.
    The political satire of President Barrack Obama about his Independence Day speech was shared over 11,000 times of social media sites. However, this article was just a rumor. In fact, President Obama never said anything of the sort that would suggest he did not want Americans to celebrate the birth of this great nation. But the damage was done far before anyone could state that this was just a rumor. According to Billy Hallowell, this article was in fact just fictional humor (Hallowell 2013). Unfortunately, the article stating that this was in fact just fictional humor was only shared a little of 2,000 times on social media sites. Which article made more of an impact?
    Social media is now one of the main sources individuals use to learn about world news. If it’s on the Internet it must be true, right? Although social media has helped influence voters and gain the respect and votes for politicians, it can also negatively affect a politician due to rumors being circulated and shared so easily through social media. It is important to remember to research all information found on the Internet about politicians and controversial topics involving politicians. Using credible sources through political run websites will also help decrease the amount of misinformation being circulated.


    Works Cited
    Hallowell, B. (2013, July 03). Rumor check: Obama told congress interns not to celebrate fourth of july. The Blaze. Retrieved from http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/03/rumor-check-obama-told-congressional-interns-not-to-celebrate-the-4th-of-july/

    [Web log message]. (2013, July 02). Retrieved from http://thelibertypaper.org/2013/07/02/obama-to-college-students-do-not-celebrate-fourth-of-july/
    Ttp://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/07/03/rumor-check-obama-told-congressional-interns-not-to-celebrate-the-4th-of-july/

    ReplyDelete
  2. Response to Social Media and Politics

    Social media is popular in every aspect of life and society today. We use social media to find out new information, to find a unique place to shop, or to make connections with new and old friends. One area in which social media is playing a huge influence in today’s society is the political world. Social media will, and should, continue to play an important role in our political discourse (Donehue). The Web and social media have created a level of transparency that never before existed in our country (Donehue). This could be a good occurrence for political campaigns or it could also be bad influential on elections.
    The beneficial ways in which social media can benefit politics is through positive campaigning and word-of-mouth from users on social media. For example, in the process of an election for mayor, many people that are involved with the campaigns could post ideas or comments on their personal Facebook pages about the election that made the candidate look good. Also, these people would encourage residents in the area to vote by updating a status about the election and how important it is. This is a great networking opportunity for each separate campaign to promote their candidate.
    The negative way social media can be used in the situation of politics is the immediate knowing of a mistake is made by a candidate or if something goes wrong with a party. Instantaneous tweeting of shady government practices-and the resulting uproar-means that public bodies are more responsive than ever (Donehue). Once the ideas are tweeted – be it by a journalist or a rival politician – they become TV ad, direct mail, and attack e-mail fodder (Donehue). When something bad happens, it often spreads faster and quicker than when good news comes about. With the internet being so easy for us to access, we immediately know what happened and who was involved with it.
    Social media is becoming part of our lives daily. It can be used in a good manner or it can be used negatively. With the new ways that social media can help improve our lives can be demonstrated different ways. In conclusion, social media and politics are and always will be occurring in our future; we just must remember the correct way to use them properly so that they can be beneficial to us.

    Works Cited
    Donehue,Wesley. ( 2012). The danger of Twitter, Facebook politics. CNN Opinion. Retrieved from: http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/24/opinion/donehue-social-media-politics

    ReplyDelete